80's Classic

Friday The 13th: The Court Rules The Rights Dispute In Favor Of The Screenwriter

Friday The 13th: The Court Rules The Rights Dispute In Favor Of The Screenwriter

The Hollywood Reporter has reported that the U.S. District Court ruled that contrary to the claims of the movie’s director Sean Cunningham and other producers that the film was written as “work-made-for-hire”, the reality is different and the domestic rights to the property lie with Miller.

“I hold that Miller did not prepare the screenplay as a work for hire and that Miller’s Second Termination Notice validly terminated Horror’s rights to the copyright in the screenplay to Friday the 13th,” U.S. District Court Judge Stephan Underhill mentioned in his summary judgment.

The termination notice mentioned above is a provision of the copyright law which allows writers to terminate rights that they might have given to others on projects and reclaim the ownership of the property, 35-years after the publication. This rule is applicable only to the authors, and as per the rule, work-made-for-hire is deemed as authored by the producers, making the termination not applicable.

This decision ended the lawsuit on this specific issue of rights that was pending for close to a year now and created hurdles for the new sequels and other inspired works being created, based on the Friday the 13th franchise. However, despite Miller getting the rights, the case is not exactly resolved as you might assume. This particular rule applies only to domestic rights because The Second Termination Notice applies to domestic rights exclusively.

The producers of the film keep their rights outside the domestic market, and it is not as if these rights are a bit of a bone of contention. There is also the question of the ownership of character “Jason.” Underhill refused to give a ruling on “Jason’s” copyright observing that there might be enough proof for the producers to claim that the “Jason” written by Miller and the one featured in the sequel are dissimilar.

“I also decline to analyze the extent to which Miller can claim copyright in the monstrous ‘Jason’ figure present in sequels to the original film,” Underhill wrote. “Horror may very well be able to argue that the Jason character present in later films is distinct from the Jason character briefly present in the first film, and Horror or other participants may be able to stake a claim to have added sufficient independently copyrightable material to Jason in the sequels to hold independent copyright in the adult Jason character. That question is not properly before the court in this case, however.”

Click to add a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

80's Classic

More in 80's Classic

All-New ‘Transformers’ And ‘Ghostbusters’ Crossover Series Announced. Here’s What’s Happening

adminFebruary 20, 2019

Star Of ‘Boy Meets World’ William Daniels Stops Robbery At His Home

adminOctober 31, 2018

Toys “R” Us Comeback?!

DanielOctober 4, 2018

Amazon Prime Is Now Streaming The X-Rated Version Of Robocop

adminOctober 3, 2018

The New ‘Hellboy’ Poster Will Get You All Hyped Up

adminOctober 2, 2018

Director, Mel Gibson To Re-Create The Movie, Wild Bunch

adminSeptember 26, 2018

Al Matthews: The Actor From Aliens And Superman III Passes Away At 75

adminSeptember 25, 2018

Here Is Your First Look At ‘Space Jam 2’

adminSeptember 20, 2018

Get Ready To See Eddie Murphy In Grumpy Old Men Remake

adminSeptember 19, 2018